Question

A 2021 paper by Callaway and Sant’Anna proposed a variant of this technique to avoid a problematic “two-way fixed effect” specification for “staggered” designs. The “Ashenfelter dip” raises problems for this technique if it is unknown whether a shock is permanent or transitory. A 2004 paper by Marianne Bertrand et al. that asks “How Much Should We Trust [this technique]” simulates inconsistent standard errors using “placebo laws.” A key assumption underlying this technique is the presence of parallel trends in the pre-period. (10[1])Card and Krueger used this technique (-5[1])to study the effect of an increase in minimum wages (10[1])on employment in Pennsylvania. For 10 points, name this causal inference technique that compares the change in an outcome variable over time between treatment and control groups. (10[1])■END■ (0[1])

ANSWER: difference-in-differences [accept diff-diff or DID or DD; prompt on causal inference until read; prompt on regression; prompt on natural experiment or longitudinal study by asking “analyzed using what econometric technique?”]
<Social Science>
= Average correct buzz position

Back to tossups

Buzzes

PlayerTeamOpponentBuzz PositionValue
Arjun Bothra (UG)HaverfordVassar8110
Jeffrey Guan (UG)NYU BColumbia B87-5
Geoffrey Wu (UG)Columbia ANYU A9710
David BassJohns HopkinsRowan12410
William Groger (UG)Columbia BNYU B1250