Question

A 2021 paper by Callaway and Sant’Anna proposed a variant of this technique to avoid a problematic “two-way fixed effect” specification for “staggered” designs. The “Ashenfelter dip” raises problems for this technique if it is unknown whether a shock is permanent or transitory. A 2004 paper by Marianne Bertrand et al. that asks “How Much Should We Trust [this technique]” simulates inconsistent standard errors using “placebo laws.” A key assumption underlying this technique is the presence of parallel trends in the pre-period. Card and Krueger (10[1])used this technique (10[1])to study the effect of an increase in minimum wages on employment in Pennsylvania. For 10 points, name this (-5[1])causal inference technique that compares the change in an outcome variable over time between treatment and control groups. ■END■ (0[10])

ANSWER: difference-in-differences [accept diff-diff or DID or DD; prompt on causal inference until read; prompt on regression; prompt on natural experiment or longitudinal study by asking “analyzed using what econometric technique?”]
<Social Science>
= Average correct buzz position

Back to tossups

Buzzes

PlayerTeamOpponentBuzz PositionValue
Sam MooreDurham AOxford C8410
Parth JagtapEdinburghOxford B8710
Linus LuuCambridge CKiel106-5
Maxwell YeCambridge AImperial A1250
Jacob RobertsonOxford AImperial B1250
Michael MaysImperial ACambridge A1250
Rhys LewisCambridge BKCL1250
Haike LiuKCLCambridge B1250
Aisling SkeetDurham BSheffield1250
Kevin FlanaganBristolWarwick1250
Freddy PottsSheffieldDurham B1250
Oscar SiddleWarwickBristol1250
Taiga ClarkeImperial BOxford A1250