A defense of this concept by Max Black invoked R. B. Braithwaite’s distinction of premise-circular arguments (-5[1])and rule-circular ones. To resolve a paradox about this concept, I. J. Good rejected (10[1])Nicod’s criterion regarding an example with a white shoe. (10[1])Lawlike (-5[1])generalizations are a proposed solution to a problem named for this concept in (10[1])Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. (10[4])Carl Hempel’s (10[2])namesake paradox (10[1])concerns (10[1])using this (10[1])process to find evidence (10[1]-5[1])that (10[1])all ravens (10[2])are black. (10[9])Nelson Goodman (-5[1])used the terms (10[2])grue (10[1])and bleen in a (10[1])“New (10[2])Riddle” (10[1])of this process (-5[2])that builds on David (10[1]-5[1])Hume, (10[1]-5[2])who claimed that there was (10[2])no way (-5[1])to justify statements such as “the sun will rise” (10[1]-5[2])tomorrow. (10[2]-5[1])For 10 points, name (-5[1])this process of using observations (-5[1])to make (10[1])inferences, (10[1]-5[2])often (10[1])contrasted (10[1])with deduction. (10[6])■END■ (10[14])