Richard Epstein argued that these things’ constitutional protections were weakened by the Blaisdell case’s upholding of a Minnesota housing law. The “freedom” of these things was at the center of a 1905 case with a majority opinion by Rufus Peckham. A ruling whose only dissent doubted the liberty of these things, Coppage (10[1])v. (10[1])Kansas, was overturned after banning a type of these things in (10[1])1932. The Three Musketeers adhered to an anti-economic regulation agenda after a ruling regarding a baker’s right to these things (-5[2])in the Lochner case. An outlawed one of these things that was used to prevent unionization was called its “yellow dog” (10[1])type. (10[1])For 10 points, Article I, Section (-5[1])10, Clause 1 outlines what enforceable binding agreements between parties? (10[1])■END■ (10[3])