Question

William P. Alston wrote an essay titled, “What [this character] Should Have Said” that examines divine-command theory. For 10 points each:
[10m] Name this title character of a Platonic dialogue, who is on his way to prosecute his father before another figure asks him whether “the pious [is] loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?”
ANSWER: Euthyphro (“YOO-thuh-froh”) [accept “What Euthyphro Should Have Said”]
[10e] In his namesake dialogue, Euthyphro is interrogated by this philosopher who names a method of inquiry through repeated questioning.
ANSWER: Socrates [accept Socratic method]
[10h] Original-language term required. Peter Geach (“geech”) criticized Socrates’s assumption that one cannot know instances of a word without providing a definition as potentially “morally harmful,” since it leads to this state often translated as “puzzlement,” common in Platonic dialogues.
ANSWER: aporia
<Philosophy>

Back to bonuses

Summary

Data

Durham BBristol B0101020
Cambridge CBristol A010010
Durham AImperial B1010020
Cambridge BLSE A1010020
Cambridge AManchester10101030
Imperial AOxford A010010
Cambridge DOxford B1010020
EdinburghVanderbilt010010
BirminghamWarwick A1010020
LSE BWarwick B1010020