Question

William P. Alston wrote an essay titled, “What [this character] Should Have Said” that examines divine-command theory. For 10 points each:
[10m] Name this title character of a Platonic dialogue, who is on his way to prosecute his father before another figure asks him whether “the pious [is] loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?”
ANSWER: Euthyphro (“YOO-thuh-froh”) [accept “What Euthyphro Should Have Said”]
[10e] In his namesake dialogue, Euthyphro is interrogated by this philosopher who names a method of inquiry through repeated questioning.
ANSWER: Socrates [accept Socratic method]
[10h] Original-language term required. Peter Geach (“geech”) criticized Socrates’s assumption that one cannot know instances of a word without providing a definition as potentially “morally harmful,” since it leads to this state often translated as “puzzlement,” common in Platonic dialogues.
ANSWER: aporia
<Philosophy>

Back to bonuses

Summary

Data

WashU DIndiana B010010
Purdue AMiami010010
WashU BNorthwestern A1010020
UChicago CNotre Dame1010020
Purdue CIndiana A010010
UChicago BPurdue D1010020
SIUE AUIUC A1010020
UIUC CUChicago D1010020
UChicago AWashU C10101030