Ernest Gellner’s characterization of this system as a “blueprint for a social order” was criticized (-5[1])by Talal Asad, who lamented the lack of a “coherent anthropology (-5[1])of” this system (-5[1])in an article that calls it a “discursive (10[1])tradition.” (10[2])Two antipodal countries’ figures (10[1])in this system named Lyusi and Kalijaga recur throughout a book titled for this system. A (-5[1])1960 book (10[1])partly titled for an (-5[1])island distinguishes versions of this religion (10[1])between the doctrinal santri (10[1])and ritualistic abangan. (10[3]-5[1])One author used his (10[1])technique of “thick description” (10[4]-5[1])to compare this (10[1]-5[1])religion’s (-5[2])divergent (10[4])cultures (10[5])in an African (10[2])and an Asian country. (10[8])For (10[1])10 points, (10[1])a (10[1])Clifford Geertz (10[1])book (10[3]-5[1])titled (-5[1])for what religion (10[3]-5[1])“observed” (10[7])discusses (10[1])its practice (10[2])in Morocco (10[4])and (10[2])Indonesia? (10[15])■END■ (10[37])