This book imagines a person “spraying pink enamel paint on a piece of driftwood” to argue against the claim that laboring always produces value. This book uses a “zipper argument” to show that another thinker’s theory (15[1])renders any original act of appropriation unjust. The “epistemic border crossing principle” (-5[1])is used in this book to defend permissible encroachments of individual rights. In a section contrasting (-5[1])(*) “historical” and “patterned” theories, this book argues that a person is only entitled to a holding if it was justly acquired and justly transferred. (10[1])The example of pouring tomato (10[1])juice (10[2])into the (10[1])ocean (10[1])is used to criticize (10[1])the labor mixing theory of property in this book, which argues (10[1])against distributive justice by imagining people (10[1])choosing to give money (10[2])to Wilt (10[2]-5[1])Chamberlain. (10[2])For 10 points, (10[1])a minimal state is advocated for in what response to A Theory of Justice by Robert Nozick? (10[1])■END■ (10[1])