A stringent reading of a theory of this concept seems to entail “zipping back,” in which the actions of persons Y through A become impermissible. Leonard Hobhouse’s distinction of this concept’s “use” and “power” aspects is replaced with a Hegelian “personhood hierarchy” in a paper by Margaret Jane Radin. Calabresi and Melamed distinguished rules of this concept and “liability rules.” A thinker qualified his theory of this concept’s “ingrossment” with the “spoilage condition” and the “enough-and-as-good” clause. That thinker wrote that “men enter into society” to preserve this concept, but constrained its creation with a “proviso” that was modified by Robert Nozick. The Second Treatise argues that this concept is acquired by mixing land and labor. For 10 points, Lockean natural rights entitle one to life, liberty, and what type of ownership? ■END■
ANSWER: property [accept right to property, property rights, proprietary, or property rules; accept possessions, estate, title, entitlement, holdings, takings, dominion, dominium, or word forms of any; accept ownership or appropriation or word forms until each is read; prompt on natural rights by asking “to what?”; prompt on justice in holdings]
<Philosophy>
= Average correct buzz position