A 2008 paper by Jessica L. Weeks questions the common view that these systems are better at signaling through analysis of the MID data set. One paper by Baliga, Lucca, and Sjostrom proposes a game theoretic model in which these systems by default have a “dovish” bias, supporting a dyadic explanation of a thesis named for them. James Fearon (15[1])argued that these systems are better at conveying their intentions (-5[2])in times of military crisis due (-5[1])to (*) “audience (10[1])costs.” These systems (10[1])are unlikely (-5[1])to go into (-5[1])conflict (10[3])with each other (10[4])according (10[3])to a (10[1])namesake (10[5]-5[2])“peace (10[1])theory.” (10[9]-5[1])Countries like Hungary and Poland (-5[1])have demonstrated these (10[1])governments’ namesake “backsliding,” (10[1])reducing (10[1])their scores on the Polity (10[2])IV scale. For 10 points, name these governments in which decision-making power is held by the people. (10[3])■END■ (10[4])