A 2008 paper by Jessica L. Weeks questions the common view that these systems are better at signaling through analysis of the MID (15[1])data set. One paper by Baliga, Lucca, and Sjostrom proposes a game theoretic model in which these systems by default have a “dovish” bias, supporting a dyadic explanation of a thesis named for them. James Fearon (-5[1])argued (-5[1])that these systems (15[1])are (15[2])better at conveying their intentions in times of military crisis due to (*) “audience costs.” These systems (10[1])are unlikely (-5[1])to go into conflict (10[1])with each other (10[2])according (10[2])to a namesake (10[2]-5[1])“peace (10[1])theory.” (10[8]-5[1])Countries like Hungary and Poland (-5[1])have demonstrated these (10[1])governments’ (10[1]-5[1])namesake “backsliding,” (10[1])reducing (10[1])their scores (10[1])on the (10[1])Polity (10[2])IV scale. For 10 (10[1])points, name these governments in which decision-making power is held by the (10[1])people. (10[2])■END■ (10[3])