Question

Kemeny and Oppenheim’s “indirect” view of this process was one of many classified by Kenneth Schaffner. Explanation and this process conflict with empiricism according to a paper that coined the term “incommensurable” by Paul Feyerabend. (-5[2])Ernest Nagel’s model of this process (-5[1])uses “bridge laws” to link scientific theories. (-5[1])An “ism” named for this process is divided into “good” and “greedy” versions in Darwin’s Dangerous Idea and follows the analytic-synthetic distinction as the second of Quine’s “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” This word denotes the process of explaining a complex phenomenon via a more fundamental one, which is often used in a negative sense to imply oversimplification. For 10 points, (10[1])a logical fallacy is named for doing what process “to absurdity,” or ad absurdum? ■END■ (10[3]0[1])

ANSWER: reduction [or word forms such as reducing or reductive; accept scientific reduction; accept greedy reductionism; accept reductio ad absurdum] (Feyerabend’s paper is “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism.”)
<TM, Philosophy>
= Average correct buzz position

Back to tossups

Buzzes

PlayerTeamOpponentBuzz PositionValue
Ezra SantosChicago BIllinois C34-5
Andrew WangIllinois AChicago D34-5
Jakob MyersIndiana AWashU A40-5
John MarvinChicago AIndiana B47-5
Neal JoshiWashU BMissoui S&T10710
Collin NadarajahWashU AIndiana A12210
Jiping FangIllinois CChicago B12210
Elizabeth BowlingIndiana BChicago A1220
Max HodesChicago DIllinois A12210

Summary

Great Lakes2025-02-01Y683%0%50%116.00
Lower Mid-Atlantic2025-02-01Y1100%0%0%104.00
Midwest2025-02-01Y580%0%80%118.25
Northeast2025-02-01Y3100%0%100%121.00