Answer the following about philosophical insights that might be gained from interactions with the official Peter Singer chatbot at petersinger.ai, for 10 points each.
[10e] AI Peter suggests trying his recipes in order to better keep with the utilitarian principles of his book titled for the liberation of these beings. Singer argues for a set of rights for these beings, separate from human rights.
ANSWER: animals [accept animal rights or Animal Liberation]
[10m] When asked to write a question about himself, AI Peter writes a tossup cluing an essay titled for these events, “Affluence, and Morality.” Amartya Sen claimed these events have never happened in a functioning democracy.
ANSWER: famines [accept “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”]
[10h] When asked to criticize that essay, AI Peter raises the “objection” named for this property of utilitarianism. A Shelly Kagan paper that asks whether consequentialism has this property denies the idea of “supererogatory” (“super-uh-ROG-uh-tory”) acts.
ANSWER: demandingness [or demandingness objection or “Does Consequentialism Demand Too Much?”; accept answers describing that the moral philosophy is too demanding of its followers]
<Johns Hopkins A, Philosophy>