A critique titled for this concept analyzes whether it maps to Yapese concepts of tabinau (“tah-bee-NOW”) or genung (“kah-NONG”). Anthropological understandings of this concept extrapolated from specifically American notions of it, according to a book subtitled for “A Cultural Account” of it by David M. Schneider. Alfred Kroeber (“CROW-bur”) criticized a distinction between descriptive and classificatory versions of this concept, which can also include (*) bifurcate merging. The importance (10[1])of reciprocity for this concept was advanced by a book titled (-5[1])for its Elementary Structures (10[2])by Claude (10[1])Levi-Strauss. (10[1])Versions of this concept named for Sudanese, Hawaiʻian, (10[1])and Iroquois (10[1])groups were defined by Lewis Henry Morgan. For 10 points, name this concept which includes systems of matrilineal and patrilineal descent. (10[1])■END■ (10[1])