Description acceptable. Kant claimed that people making these arguments cannot sincerely believe them in an essay “On the Miscarriage of All Philosophical Trials in [them].” In a dialogue, Maximus and Themistius refute arguments of this type made by rationaux (“rah-see-oh-NO”) such as Jean Le Clerc and Isaac Jacquelot. A posteriori reasons support Zoroaster’s arguments of this type more than those of Melissus, according to Clarification on the Manicheans. Pierre Bayle argued that we should abandon these arguments, which are contrasted with (*) defenses, and presuppose a first principle. Kant theorized a central concept’s “radical” form (-5[1])in one of these arguments from Religion (-5[1])Within the Bounds of Reason (-5[1])Alone. For 10 points, Leibniz’s claim (10[1]-5[1])that we live (10[1])in the best of all possible worlds (10[1])is what sort of argument (10[2])that explains why God (10[1])allows bad things? (10[1])■END■ (10[5])