This book claims the statement “I think” does not imply “I am” because it is embedded in a set of assumptions called the “unthought.” This book’s eighth chapter describes three “quasi-transcendentals” whose study exemplifies mathesis. This book describes a contradictory “doublet” created by identifying the transcendental self with the empirical self, which various thinkers have tried to collapse via the “analytic of finitude.” This book claims that philosophy after (*) Kant is characterized by the “return of language” and the epistemological concept of man. This book argues that taxonomic classification (10[1])characterized what it was possible to think in the Classical era, (10[1])which is that era’s episteme. (10[2]-5[3])For 10 points, (-5[1])an (-5[1])analysis of Las (10[1])Meninas begins (10[1])what (10[1])“Archaeology of the Human (10[1])Sciences” by Michel Foucault? (10[1])■END■ (10[1]0[2])