The paper that first posited this scenario outlines a story about a man storming out of a restaurant without eating a hamburger. A reply to this thought experiment imagines a man who produces light by waving a magnet up and down and was posited by Patricia and Paul Churchland. Roger Schank is discussed in the paper that originated this thought experiment, which is subject to the “systems reply.” The subject of this thought experiment cannot exhibit (*) intentionality according to a paper that distinguishes between a “cautious” concept and a counterpart that actually behaves as a mind. In the paper “Minds, Brains, and Programs,” this thought experiment was first posited by John Searle. For 10 points, what thought experiment likens strong AI to a man using a dictionary to write in a certain language that he does not understand? ■END■
ANSWER: Chinese room argument [or Chinese room experiment]
<Aum Mundhe, Philosophy>
= Average correct buzz position