The first section of William Vallicella’s paper on “Bradley’s Regress and Relation-Instances” is named for translating Bradley’s argument from “Baroque Victorian into Aseptic [this adjective].” For 10 points each:
[10e] Name this adjective that defines a type of truth differentiated from synthetic truth. This adjective is also ascribed to a broad style of philosophy often in dichotomy with continental philosophy.
ANSWER: analytic [accept analytic philosophy; accept analytic truths or analytic propositions; accept “Bradley’s Argument Translated from Baroque Victorian into Aseptic Analytic”]
[10m] Uniting these things via relations is said to be impossible by Bradley’s regress. In An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, John Locke separated these things into primary and secondary examples.
ANSWER: qualities [or quality; accept properties or property; accept primary qualities or primary quality or secondary qualities or secondary quality]
[10h] Bradley’s regress originated with an argument in this book, in which F. H. Bradley proposed the lump of sugar argument and conceived that the independence and internality of relations makes them incoherent.
ANSWER: Appearance and Reality
<SM, Philosophy>