This property is defined through states of affairs by James Ross, who built on Gottfried Leibniz’s earlier formulation of it. This concept is likened to a Parliament’s sovereignty in a paper contrasting “adequate” and “fallacious” solutions to its other title concept. To rebut a theory of this concept, Alvin Plantinga posited a being named McEar. (-5[1])Plantinga’s free will defense is only admitted if this property is denied, according to a paper by (*) J. L. Mackie. In an analysis of this concept, Thomas Aquinas posited a triangle whose angles sum to over 180 degrees and held that it does not apply when considering logically impossible actions. A wholly good, all-knowing God with this other property (10[1])is central to logical formulations of the problem of evil. For 10 points, the stone paradox asks if a god with what property could create an unliftable stone? ■END■ (10[2])