Question
This clique’s usage of superstandard English and polysyllabic words led Mary Bucholtz (“BUCK-holts”) to categorize them as “hyperwhite.” For 10 points each:
[10e] Identify this stigmatized social category whom Bucholtz contrasted with burnouts and jocks. This clique is stereotypically cast as intellectually overachieving and socially underachieving.
ANSWER: nerds [accept nerd girls]
[10m] Bucholtz’s study of nerd girls showed that their identity practices drew from a resistance to this phonological process. Nasals often undergo this process with their following stop, like with the phoneme /n/ (“n”) in the word “pancake” but not “pan.”
ANSWER: assimilation [accept place assimilation; accept nasal assimilation or nasal place assimilation]
[10h] Bucholtz and Hall’s framework for sociocultural linguistic analysis uses this concept to describe how linguistic forms construct identity. This concept refers to the creation of semiotic links between a sign and its context, and it is related to deixis.
ANSWER: indexicality
<CH, Social Science>
Summary
| 2024 ARCADIA at BU | 2024-12-06 | Y | 7 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at Duke | 2024-12-06 | Y | 3 | 13.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at Missouri S&T | 2024-12-06 | Y | 1 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA Online | 2025-05-17 | Y | 5 | 8.00 | 60% | 20% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at Penn State | 2024-12-06 | Y | 2 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at Florida Tech | 2024-12-06 | Y | 4 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at UC Berkeley | 2024-12-06 | Y | 2 | 15.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at Waterloo | 2024-11-09 | Y | 6 | 11.67 | 83% | 33% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at GT | 2024-12-06 | Y | 5 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at GT | 2024-12-06 | Y | 1 | 10.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at GT | 2024-12-06 | Y | 1 | 20.00 | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at Illinois | 2024-11-09 | Y | 4 | 10.00 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at Warwick | 2024-12-06 | Y | 5 | 8.00 | 80% | 0% | 0% |
| 2024 ARCADIA at Claremont | 2024-11-02 | Y | 3 | 13.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% |
Data
| Georgia Tech C | Innovation Academy B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech C | Lambert | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech C | Lambert | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 |
| Georgia Tech C | Innovation Academy B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech B | Milton | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech B | Milton | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech B | Mississippi State | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech B | Mississippi State | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech C | Innovation Academy B | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech C | Lambert | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech C | Lambert | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech C | Innovation Academy B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Georgia Tech D | Innovation Academy C | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Innovation Academy A | Innovation Academy B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech A | Johns Creek | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech B | Milton | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech B | Milton | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech B | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Georgia Tech B | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |