This book argues that certain “material falsities” give rise to ideas with objective reality but no corresponding formal reality. In a letter, this book’s author defended one of its conclusions by appealing to three types of “primitive notions” and a Scholastic idea of heaviness. An (10[1])objection by Pierre Gassendi, (10[1])included in a set of “objections and replies” (10[1])appended to this book, (10[1])critiques how this book compares a chiliagon and a myriagon to distinguish imagination and pure intellect. Elisabeth of Bohemia pressed this book’s (10[1])author on how its concepts of extended substance and (10[1])thinking substance interact. (10[1])This book claims that “clear and distinct” ideas (-5[1])allowed its author to comprehend a piece of wax. (10[1])For 10 points, the evil demon appears in (-5[1])what book by René Descartes that follows Discourse on Method? (0[2]) (10[2])■END■