Question
Answer the following about the structure of the iron pentacarbonyl metal complex, for 10 points each.
[10e] The carbonyl ligands bond to the iron with an antibonding orbital via this interaction, termed its namesake “backbonding.” P-orbitals overlap laterally in this interaction, which is found with a sigma bond in double bonds.
ANSWER: pi bond [accept pi backbonding]
[10m] Iron pentacarbonyl exhibits a low but present rate of Berry pseudorotation due to having this coordination geometry. In VSEPR theory, molecules with this geometry have three equatorial and two axial substituents.
ANSWER: trigonal bipyramidal
[10h] Iron pentacarbonyl obeys this statement governing the stability of transition metal complexes. Coordinatively saturated complexes satisfy this statement, but d8 complexes like Zeise’s salt are common counterexamples.
ANSWER: 18-electron rule
<Chemistry>
Summary
| 2024 ACF Winter at UC Berkeley | 2024-11-16 | Y | 3 | 20.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 2024 ACF Winter at Clemson | 2024-11-16 | Y | 8 | 13.75 | 75% | 63% | 0% |
| 2024 ACF Winter at Clemson | 2024-11-16 | Y | 8 | 18.75 | 25% | 100% | 63% |
| 2024 ACF Winter at Lehigh | 2024-11-16 | Y | 9 | 20.00 | 89% | 89% | 22% |
| 2024 ACF Winter at Northwestern | 2024-11-16 | Y | 9 | 17.78 | 78% | 89% | 11% |
| 2024 ACF Winter at Ohio State | 2024-11-16 | Y | 8 | 11.25 | 50% | 63% | 0% |
| 2024 ACF Winter at Online | 2024-11-16 | Y | 9 | 8.89 | 56% | 22% | 11% |
| 2024 ACF Winter at UBC | 2024-11-16 | Y | 3 | 20.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 2024 ACF Winter at Oxford | 2024-11-16 | Y | 11 | 11.82 | 55% | 55% | 9% |
Data
| Georgia Tech B | Tennesse A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech B | Alabama A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech B | Alabama A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech B | Tennesse A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Auburn A | Tusculum A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Auburn A | Georgia Tech A | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Auburn A | Georgia Tech A | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 |
| Auburn A | Tusculum A | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Tusculum A | Clemson A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tennesse A | Emory A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech E | Alabama A | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech E | Auburn B | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech E | Auburn B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech E | Alabama A | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 |
| Georgia A | Georgia Tech F | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia A | Georgia Tech F | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 |
| Georgia A | Emory A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia A | Emory A | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 |
| Georgia Tech C | Emory B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech C | South Carolina A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech C | South Carolina A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech C | Emory B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Emory B | Tennesse B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech E | Alabama A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech E | Auburn B | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 |
| Georgia Tech E | Auburn B | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech E | Alabama A | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 |
| Auburn A | Tusculum A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Auburn A | Georgia Tech A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Auburn A | Georgia Tech A | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 |
| Auburn A | Tusculum A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| Auburn B | Auburn C | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia A | Georgia Tech F | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia A | Georgia Tech F | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 |
| Georgia A | Emory A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia A | Emory A | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 |
| Georgia Tech B | Tennesse A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech B | Alabama A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech B | Alabama A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech B | Tennesse A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech C | Emory B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech C | South Carolina A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech C | South Carolina A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech C | Emory B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Georgia Tech D | Tennesse B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| Georgia Tech A | South Carolina A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 |