A paper about this issue gave the term “G. E. Moore shift” to describe one potential response to a logical version of it. In that paper, William Rowe used an example that includes a forest fire to suggest an “evidential” formulation of this issue. A set of dialogues by David Hume popularized this issue as a trilemma attributed to Epicurus. Alvin Plantinga attempted to resolve (-5[1])this issue (10[1])by pointing to the existence of “morally significant” (10[1])free will. Theodicies, or arguments against (-5[1])this issue, (10[1])are named after a Leibniz work that claims we (-5[1])live in “the (10[1])best of all possible worlds” to defend the existence of a being that is both omnipotent and benevolent. (10[1]-5[1])For 10 points, name this issue that asks why God allows (10[1])bad things to happen. ■END■ (10[1]0[2])