Question
The Rotterdam model can be used to estimate one form of this quantity, for which Richard Stone was the first to empirically derive a linear expenditure system. For a firm in a perfectly competitive market, this quantity is infinitely elastic. The Slutsky equation relates the Marshallian form of this quantity to its Hicksian form by accounting for the substitution and income effects. The cross elasticity of this quantity measures its sensitivity to changes in a different good’s price. For Veblen goods, this quantity [emphasize] increases as price increases, often due to the value of those goods as status symbols. For 10 points, what quantity is defined as consumers’ willingness and ability to buy a certain good? ■END■
ANSWER: demand [accept consumer demand; reject “spending”]
<Social Science>
= Average correct buzz position
Buzzes
Player | Team | Opponent | Buzz Position | Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leonard Castine (DII) | Penn B (DII) | Fordham A | 42 | 10 |
Jason Qin (DII) | Columbia J (DII) | Rowan A (DII) | 42 | 10 |
Rohit C | Maryland B | Columbia A | 49 | 10 |
Andy Yu (DII) | Maryland A (DII) | Rutgers B | 59 | 10 |
Chase Barrick (DII) | Lehigh A (UG) | NYU B | 61 | 10 |
Lucas Shedlock (UG) | Princeton A (UG) | Bard A (UG) | 64 | 10 |
Vedh Ramesh (DII) | Penn A (DII) | Columbia B | 70 | 10 |
Caedmon Holland (DII) | Lehigh B (DII) | Rutgers A (UG) | 82 | 10 |
Summary
2024 ACF Fall at Cornell | fall | Y | 8 | 100% | 0% | 25% | 88.63 |
2024 ACF Fall at Ohio State | fall | Y | 8 | 100% | 0% | 13% | 63.00 |
2024 ACF Fall at Washington | fall | Y | 6 | 100% | 0% | 17% | 59.17 |
2024 ACF Fall at Georgia | fall | Y | 9 | 100% | 0% | 22% | 77.22 |
2024 ACF Fall at North Carolina | fall | Y | 9 | 100% | 0% | 22% | 84.22 |
2024 ACF Fall at Claremont Colleges | fall | Y | 5 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 64.80 |
2024 ACF Fall at Rutgers | fall | Y | 8 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 58.63 |
2024 ACF Fall at Illinois | fall | Y | 9 | 100% | 0% | 22% | 70.22 |