A work by Necip Fikri Alican defends a member of this school of thought from accusations of having committed naturalistic, equivocation and composition fallacies in a “notorious” proof. The fourth chapter of one work from this school of thought argues for the insusceptibility to proof of a principle an earlier thinker had explained by noting that mankind is “under the governance of two sovereign masters.” This school of thought was criticised by (*) Robert Nozick in a thought experiment about whether one should prioritise a namesake “monster.” To (10[2])determine the degree of pleasure an action produces, members of this school (10[1])of thought may employ the felicific calculus. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill espoused, for 10 points, what school of thought that promotes the “greatest happiness principle”? ■END■