Along with a negative equivalent, this property is rejected as a “characterizing property” by noneists (“nun-ists”) like Richard Sylvan. A paper about this property by W. V. O. Quine discusses the “Plato’s beard” problem, which he argues causes it to be ascribed too frequently. According to Alexius (-5[1])Meinong (“MY-nong”), it is possible for objects (10[1])to have being but lack this property, (10[1])a status used by later scholars to define his namesake jungle. Nominalists reject the idea that universals have this property. In predicate logic, some object with this property is indicated with a backwards capital “E.” Materialists believe that only matter has this property. For 10 points, name this quality of objects that are not imaginary. ■END■ (10[2])