In this text, a mind responds to a question that begins “If man had no eternal consciousness…” with the word “despair” rather than, “Like the donkey, feeding on the roses of illusion.” A Thomas Nagel essay analogizes (-5[1])a central concept of this text to skepticism because both are enabled through “the capacity to transcend ourselves in thought.” This essay (10[1])equates a central concept to “sin without God” in a section that references (10[1])its exploration by Lev Shestov and Søren Kierkegaard. This essay’s introduction argues that we must judge “whether life is or is not worth living” to answer the “one truly (10[2])serious philosophical (10[1])problem.” This essay posits the absurd as an alternative to (10[1])suicide (10[1])before arguing that we must imagine its title figure (-5[1])happy. For 10 points, name this essay by Albert Camus (“al-BAIR kah-MOO”) titled for a man (10[1])who is condemned to eternally push a boulder up a hill. (10[1])■END■