To criticize theories of this property, Laurence BonJour imagines a clairvoyant man named Norman (-5[1])thinking the president was in New York. (-5[2])To explain different levels of this property, Roderick Chisholm borrows legal terms like (-5[1])“beyond reasonable doubt” while (-5[1])explicating (-5[1])his theory of internalism. An Alvin Goldman (-5[2])paper argues (-5[1])that this property (10[1])comes from the reliability of (10[1])mental processes (10[1]-5[1])that lead (-5[1])to ideas; (10[1])that paper influenced reliabilism, (-5[1])which disagrees with evidentialism over the circumstances where beliefs can hold this property. (-5[4])In (-5[1])English, (10[1]-5[1])this (10[1])property (-5[2])is the first part of a traditional (10[2])three-word (10[3]-5[1])definition (10[9])criticized (10[5])by (10[2])Edmund (10[2])Gettier (10[7])in a 3-page (10[3])paper. (10[5]-5[1])For 10 points, according to a definition given by Plato in Theaetetus, (10[1]-5[1])what additional (-5[1])property must true belief (10[1])have to be (10[2])knowledge? (10[3])■END■ (10[15]0[6])