A book claims that a form of this concept is the difference between a life where the “keynote” is resignation or hope; that book argues for experiences to be judged “by their fruits, not by their roots” to support the “over” form of this concept. The “right to” this concept is illustrated by a hiker coming across an icy ledge on a mountainous trail. (-5[1])A form of this concept that a philosopher deems amoral is illustrated (-5[1])by a shipowner (10[1])selling trips (-5[1])on a boat (10[2])he knows (-5[1])is dangerous. (10[2]-5[3])A (10[1])principle that defines when this concept is wrong (10[1]-5[1])“always, (-5[1])everywhere, and for anyone” (-5[1])is found (10[1]-5[1])in a W. (-5[1])K. Clifford (10[1])article (10[1])titled for the (-5[1])“Ethics (10[1])of” (10[3])this concept. (10[2]-5[2])This is the second (-5[1])concept in the title of an 1896 lecture (-5[1])that (10[1])argues for having religious faith despite a lack of evidence. (-5[1])For 10 points, (10[1]-5[2])a William (-5[1])James lecture (-5[1])is titled (10[2])for the “Will to” (10[2]-5[1])what (10[4]-5[1])religious (10[2])concept? (10[4]-5[1])■END■ (10[35]0[23])