These things are described as “anti-utilitarian” in a book that imagines Hercules distinguishing between concepts (-5[1])and conceptions. (-5[1])Carl Cohen (-5[1])argued (-5[1])against some types (-5[1])of these things by defining them as claims within a “moral world.” In building his “case” for a type of these concepts, Tom Regan (15[1])used the subject-of-a-life (15[3])criterion. (15[3])A book titled for these concepts (15[1])differentiates between (*) equal treatment and treatment (-5[1])as an equal. (10[2]-5[1])Jeremy Bentham’s (-5[1])claim that (10[1])these concepts (10[1])are (10[1])“nonsense upon (10[1])stilts” (10[5])was challenged (10[1])in a (10[1])Ronald (10[1])Dworkin (10[2])book titled Taking (-5[1])[these things] (10[1])Seriously. (10[2])The argument from marginal cases is used to argue that these concepts should be extended to animals. (10[6])For 10 points, (10[3])the Declaration (10[1])of Independence (10[2]-5[1])states that (10[1])life and liberty are (10[1])“unalienable” examples of what concepts? ■END■ (10[5])