David Griffiths claims that there are really two laws of this process and that only relativity explains the equivalence between a central quantity and its “motional” form. (-5[1])In a common demonstration of this (-5[1])process, a magnet dropped through (10[1])a copper tube falls (10[1]-5[1])unexpectedly (10[4]-5[3])slowly. (10[15]-5[7])This (10[1])process is governed (10[1]-5[2])by (10[2])the equation (10[1])“del cross (10[1])E (10[5])equals minus (10[2])dB/dt,” (10[3]-5[1])which (10[1])implies (10[2])that the negative (-5[1])time derivative of magnetic flux (10[1])equals (10[1]-5[1])the (-5[1])emf (10[6]0[1]-5[3])(“E-M-F”). This (10[1])process (10[1])creates eddy currents (10[2]-5[1])that rapidly (10[4]-5[1])heat (10[1])metal (10[1])in a namesake type of (-5[1])cooktop. (10[14]-5[2])Lenz’s (10[6])Law (10[10])explains (10[4]-5[1])the (-5[1])negative (-5[1])sign in Faraday’s (10[1])law (10[1])of this process. (10[1])For 10 points, (0[1])name this process in which a changing magnetic field creates (-5[1])an electric (10[1])field. (10[2])■END■ (10[21]0[10])