Philippa Foot compared normative judgments to club rules and etiquette in a paper partially titled for these statements. For 10 points each:
[10h] Name these statements that tell people what they should do if they have a certain desire or value a certain end.
ANSWER: hypothetical imperatives [or hypothetischer imperativen; accept “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives”; prompt on imperatives or imperativen]
[10e] This philosopher argued that all moral imperatives are hypothetical, not categorical, in On the Basis of Morality. This philosopher critiqued Kant’s “thing-in-itself” in The World as Will and Representation.
ANSWER: Arthur Schopenhauer
[10m] Christine Korsgaard argued against “motivational skepticism” about this faculty, which questions whether moral behavior is motivated by imperatives of any kind. Kant called the categorical imperative the “supreme principle” of this faculty, which titles his “second critique.”
ANSWER: practical reason [or praktischen vernunft; accept pure practical reason; accept “Skepticism About Practical Reason”; accept Critique of Practical Reason or Kritik der praktischen Vernunft; prompt on reason]
<FW, Philosophy>