Question
A high-frequency form of this technique can measure nanomolar changes in biomolecule concentration in a minimally invasive fashion. A form of this technique produces a characteristic peak-to-peak separation between E-sub-pc and E-sub-pa of “57 over n” when applied to a reversible process. The highest value measured in one form of this technique is proportional to the square root of the product of the diffusion constant and scan rate according to the Randles–Ševčík (“shev-CHEEK”) equation. This technique’s input can be adjusted stepwise to produce a staircase pattern. A form of this technique produces closed, “duck-shaped” curves when plotting current over time. For 10 points, name this electrochemical technique where the potential of an electrode is varied, which comes in “linear sweep” and “cyclic” forms. ■END■
Summary
California | 2025-02-01 | Y | 2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 105.50 |
Great Lakes | 2025-02-01 | Y | 5 | 20% | 0% | 40% | 72.00 |
Lower Mid-Atlantic | 2025-02-01 | Y | 6 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 100.67 |
Midwest | 2025-02-01 | Y | 6 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 89.17 |
Overflow | 2025-02-01 | Y | 4 | 75% | 0% | 0% | 83.33 |
Pacific Northwest | 2025-02-01 | Y | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 72.00 |
Southeast | 2025-02-01 | Y | 3 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 104.67 |
UK | 2025-02-01 | Y | 8 | 25% | 0% | 0% | 96.50 |
Buzzes
Player | Team | Opponent | Buzz Position | Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ezra Santos | Chicago B | Missouri | 68 | 10 |
Andrew Wang | Illinois A | Indiana B | 70 | 10 |
Stan Melkumian | Purdue | Notre Dame B | 71 | 10 |
Arya Karthik | Oxford A | Cambridge A | 71 | 10 |
Calvin Bostleman | Ohio State A | Michigan A | 72 | 10 |
Matt Schiavone | Northwestern A | Notre Dame A | 72 | 10 |
Russell Nip | UBC | Alberta | 72 | 10 |
Rasheeq Azad | UNC B | Wake Forest | 88 | 10 |
Rohan Shelke | UC Berkeley B | UC Berkeley A | 91 | 10 |
Michael Eng | UNC C | UNC D | 93 | 10 |
Yash Mandavia | Illinois B | WashU A | 93 | 10 |
Neal Joshi | WashU B | Illinois C | 93 | 10 |
Sam Konkel | Chicago C | Missoui S&T | 95 | 10 |
Rohan Dalal | Georgia Tech C | Bruin A | 95 | 10 |
Tianyu Xu | Georgia Tech A | Louisville A | 98 | 10 |
Aditya Patnaik | Ohio State B | Michigan C | 105 | -5 |
Allan Lee | Stanford B | Iowa | 107 | 10 |
Alex Akridge | Indiana A | Chicago D | 116 | 10 |
Alex Zhu | Carnegie Mellon B | Michigan State | 118 | -5 |
Kevin Park | Claremont A | Claremont B | 120 | 10 |
Chris Yoo | William & Mary | Virginia Tech A | 121 | 10 |
Brina Ratangee | Vanderbilt A | Alabama A | 121 | 10 |
Sai Subramanian | Case Western A | Kenyon | 122 | 0 |
Cole Polley | Michigan D | Case Western B | 122 | 0 |
Anthony Yin | Case Western B | Michigan D | 122 | 0 |
Dennis Yang | Michigan C | Ohio State B | 122 | 0 |
Anton Akroush | Michigan State | Carnegie Mellon B | 122 | 0 |
Alexandra Knight | Liberty C | Liberty B | 122 | 0 |
Joseph Chambers | Virginia A | Liberty A | 122 | 0 |
Jonathan Bost | Liberty B | Liberty C | 122 | 0 |
Benny Shtutman | South Carolina | Duke | 122 | 0 |
Josh Schmidt | Liberty A | Virginia A | 122 | 0 |
Koji Bilbao | Duke | South Carolina | 122 | 0 |
Will Sanders | Notre Dame C | Georgetown B | 122 | 0 |
Ben Horning | Georgetown B | Notre Dame C | 122 | 0 |
Yaj Jhajhria | UW B | UW A | 122 | 0 |
Andrei Hui | Cambridge B | Cambridge C | 122 | 0 |
Joel Dicker | Southampton B | Cambridge D | 122 | 0 |
Lewis Strachan | Cambridge E | Oxford C | 122 | 0 |
Albert Nyang | LSE | Imperial A | 122 | 10 |
Andrew Fisher | Sheffield | Manchester | 122 | 0 |
Kevin Flanagan | Bristol | Warwick A | 122 | 0 |
Adam Iqbal | Durham | Warwick B | 122 | 0 |
Tobin Payne | Warwick B | Durham | 122 | 0 |