This thinker cited a Galton board to argue that an event that is determined must arise from a set of possibilities that narrow to one. In that paper, this thinker defined a “non-necessitating cause” via the example of a bomb linked to a Geiger counter. This thinker often used the example of paying a grocer for potatoes, (10[3])as in a paper (10[1])whose title concepts (10[1])were (10[1])contrasted with “institutional” ones by John Searle (10[1])(“surl”). A book by this author of “Causality and Determination” and “On Brute Facts” (10[1])introduced (-5[1])the idea of acting “under a description.” The title concept (-5[1])of that book holds if the performer of an action can say why they chose to do (-5[1])it. This author of (10[1])Intention (10[1])coined (10[1])the term (-5[1])“consequentialism.” (10[6])For (10[1])10 points, (-5[1])what philosopher (10[1])revived virtue ethics (10[2])in (10[1])her paper (10[2])“Modern (10[1])Moral (10[2]-5[1])Philosophy”? (10[4])■END■ (10[11]0[17])