This philosopher argued for the coherence of relative truth value of propositions in his 2001 book Invariances. The counterfactual “if it were the case (15[1])that not P, S would not believe that P” appears as (15[1])the third of four conditions for knowledge in a text by this (-5[1])philosopher. (15[2])A thought experiment by this philosopher uses the premise (-5[1])that “we want to be a certain kind of person” to argue that we have reason not to want to plug (15[1])into an (*) “experience (10[3])machine.” (10[6])This philosopher (-5[1])formulated (10[2])a (10[1])truth-tracking theory of knowledge (10[3]-5[1])in (10[2])Philosophical (10[2]-5[1])Explanations (-5[1])and imagined (10[1])1 million people (-5[1])paying 25 extra (10[1])cents to watch (10[1])Wilt (10[2])Chamberlain (10[5]-5[1])in a (10[1])book (10[1])refuting A Theory of (-5[1])Justice (-5[1])by John Rawls. (10[2])For 10 points, (10[2])name this American philosopher (10[1])who argued for a minimal state (10[1])in (10[1])Anarchy, (10[1])State, (10[1])and Utopia. (10[1])■END■ (10[4]0[10])