Matthieu Queloz noted that continental philosophers favor this method more than analytic philosophers in a book about its pragmatic style. This method describes a type of anxiety suffered in the face of the contingency of our ideas, according to Amia Srinivasan. Like evolution, this method names a type of “debunking” argument that rejects a conclusion based on the origin of the beliefs that underlie it. (15[1])This method is described as (15[1])(*) “gray, meticulous, (-5[1])and patiently documentary” in a 1971 (-5[1])essay that picks up on an earlier critique of Paul Ree’s book on The Origin of the Moral (10[1])Sensations. (10[1])A book argues that a lack of “historical sense” results in philosophers failing to understand terms like “guilty conscience” when using this method, which was later used by Foucault. (10[2])For 10 points, name this method that (-5[1])Nietzsche (-5[1])applied to morality (10[3])in an 1887 (10[1])polemic. ■END■ (10[3]0[2])