A book by this thinker that proposes “eternal sentences” was referenced by the title of a “metaphysical study” by Roderick Chisholm. In a paper discussing ontological commitments, this philosopher dismissed the interlocutors McX (10[1])and Wyman’s (10[3])positions on the existence of Pegasus. (10[1])This “reluctant Platonist” used a criterion he outlined in “On What There Is” to argue, (10[1])along with Hilary Putnam, (10[4])for the existence of mathematical objects (10[1])by appealing (10[1])to their indispensability. (10[1]-5[1])Daniel Dennett used this thinker’s (10[1])name as a verb (-5[1])in the title of a paper (10[2])arguing against qualia. (10[1]-5[1])A paper by this author of Word and Object (10[2])considers (10[1])two versions of the (10[1])phrase (10[2])“No bachelor is married” to argue (-5[1])against the analytic–synthetic (10[1])distinction. For 10 points, name this American philosopher of (-5[1])“Two Dogmas (10[1])of (10[1])Empiricism.” (10[2])■END■ (10[5]0[12])