Hannah Arendt responded to a discussion of this book in The Essence of Human Freedom by claiming that a passage from this book is primarily political, in opposition to other epistemological interpretations. Leo Strauss pointed to seemingly contradictory sections of this book (-5[1])to argue that it was an ironic “learning exercise” contra Karl Popper, (-5[1])who criticized (-5[1])this book’s class of “guardians.” (10[5]-5[1])Those classes (10[3])within this book (10[2])correspond (10[1])to different (10[1])virtues (10[1])of the soul, (10[1])which this book claims is tripartite. This book opens with Thrasymachus’s (10[1])claim (10[2])that (10[1])justice is “the advantage of the stronger,” and in response, (-5[1])the central character eventually (10[1])invokes the Form of the Good. For 10 points, name this Platonic dialogue in which Socrates describes an ideal (-5[1])city. (10[2])■END■ (10[11]0[2])