A thought experiment by Kendall Walton regarding this field imagines a society where one object’s “flatness” is relevant to the categories of this field. One text distinguishes this field from the intellectual through the interaction of a “live creature” with its environment. (-5[1])George Dickie’s “institutional” theory (10[1])of a (-5[1])concept in this (-5[1])field was influenced by Arthur Danto’s (10[1])idea of a “world” (10[2])of (10[2])that concept. (10[2])A John Dewey (10[1])book (-5[1])that argues against excluding (-5[1])“useful” (10[1])objects such as pottery and rugs (-5[1])characterizes (10[1]-5[1])this (10[2])field (10[1]-5[1])“as (-5[1])experience.” (10[9]-5[1])That (10[1])book pushed (-5[1])back (10[1])against (-5[1])Kant’s third critique, (10[1])which describes four possible (10[1])judgments (10[2])made within this field that (10[1])include the sublime. (10[2])For 10 (10[1])points, (10[2]-5[1])name this field of philosophy (10[1])that studies (10[1])beauty and art. (10[5])■END■ (10[15])