Rudolf von Laban - 2024 ACF Winter

Question

Joan Littlewood’s workshops began teaching this person’s theories after their development in modern dance by Jean Newlove and Lisa Ullman. For 10 points each:

[10h] Body, effort, shape, and space are the four dimensions of what Hungarian theorist’s movement analysis? Many choreographers and roboticists map the body using a system that combines this theorist’s name with “notation.”

ANSWER: Rudolf von Laban [or Lábán Rudolf; accept Laban Movement Analysis or Labanotation]

[10e] Laban Movement Analysis is often taught in dance and this art form. This art form’s “method” type grew out of the Stanislavski system.

ANSWER: acting [accept drama or theater; accept method acting]

[10m] The highly personal style of dance developed by Laban and Mary Wigman is known by this term. This term describes stylized theater of the 1910s and ’20s, as well as related German films like The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari.

ANSWER: expressionist [or word forms like Expressionism or expressive; accept Ausdruckstanz, expressionistisches kino, or German Expressionism]

Back to bonuses

Summary


2024 ACF Winter at UC Berkeley	2024-11-16	Y	3	20.00	100%	100%	0%
2024 ACF Winter at Lehigh	2024-11-16	Y	6	16.67	83%	83%	0%
2024 ACF Winter at Northwestern	2024-11-16	Y	9	13.33	100%	33%	0%
2024 ACF Winter at Ohio State	2024-11-16	Y	7	11.43	71%	43%	0%
2024 ACF Winter at Online	2024-11-16	Y	8	11.25	75%	25%	13%
2024 ACF Winter at UBC	2024-11-16	Y	3	10.00	100%	0%	0%
2024 ACF Winter at Central Florida	2024-11-16	Y	5	12.00	100%	20%	0%
2024 ACF Winter at Oxford	2024-11-16	Y	11	19.09	91%	91%	9%
2024 ACF Winter at Brandeis	2024-11-16	Y	10	15.00	100%	40%	10%

Data


Berkeley A	Berkeley C	0	10	10	20
Berkeley B	Stanford A	0	10	10	20
Stanford M	Stanford L	0	10	10	20
Bard A	Columbia B	0	10	10	20
Haverford A	Rowan A	0	10	0	10
Columbia A	Johns Hopkins A	0	10	10	20
Penn B	Penn State B	0	0	10	10
Penn State A	Penn A	0	10	10	20
Lehigh A	Rutgers C	0	10	10	20
Notre Dame	WashU D	0	10	0	10
UIUC B	Purdue A	0	10	0	10
Indiana B	Purdue D	0	10	0	10
UChicago B	SIUE A	0	10	0	10
UIUC D	UChicago D	0	10	10	20
UIUC A	Indiana A	0	10	10	20
UIUC C	UChicago A	0	10	0	10
WashU B	UChicago C	0	10	10	20
Northwestern A	WashU C	0	10	0	10
CWRU B (UG)	CWRU D (DII)	0	0	0	0
Michigan C (UG)	Kenyon B (DII)	0	10	0	10
Michigan State B (UG)	Kenyon A (UG)	0	0	10	10
CWRU A (UG)	Michigan State C (UG)	0	10	0	10
Pitt B (UG)	Ohio State B (DII)	0	10	10	20
Michigan B	Ohio State C (DII)	0	10	0	10
Pitt A	Michigan D	0	10	10	20
Arkansas	McGill E	0	0	0	0
Central Oklahoma	NYU A	0	10	0	10
Mississippi State	Vassar B	0	10	0	10
Missouri	Texas B	0	10	10	20
Ole Miss	WUSTL A	0	0	0	0
Texas A	NYU B	0	10	10	20
Texas C	Texas D	0	10	0	10
Vassar A	Oregon State	10	10	0	20
UBC A	UW B	0	10	0	10
Alberta	UBC B	0	10	0	10
SFU	UW A	0	10	0	10
UCF B	Florida State University A	0	10	0	10
UF A	UF B	0	10	10	20
UCF A	UF C	0	10	0	10
UF D	Florida Tech B	0	10	0	10
UF E	Florida Tech A	0	10	0	10
Oxford B	Birmingham	0	10	10	20
Imperial A	Bristol B	0	10	10	20
Cambridge B	Southampton B	0	10	10	20
Durham B	Cambridge D	0	10	10	20
Durham A	Edinburgh	10	10	10	30
Imperial B	Warwick B	0	10	10	20
LSE B	Cambridge C	0	10	10	20
LSE A	Southampton A	0	10	10	20
Southampton B	Southampton A	0	0	10	10
Team 1	Oxford A	0	10	0	10
Bristol A	Warwick A	0	10	10	20
A Brandeis Supreme	Boston University B	0	10	0	10
Williams A	Amherst A	0	10	10	20
Yale B	Bowdoin A	0	10	10	20
Carabrandeis	Brown A	0	10	0	10
Bowdoin B	Clark A	0	10	0	10
Boston University A	Diamond Brandeis	0	10	0	10
Harvard A	Brandeises Brew	10	10	0	20
MIT A	Northeastern A	0	10	10	20
Yale A	Tufts B	0	10	10	20
Tufts A	Yale C	0	10	0	10