This essay argues that a certain concept survived outside of the framework that made it intelligible, leaving it with “mere mesmeric force… retaining the suggestion of force… but which no longer signifies a real concept.” In (-5[1])a footnote, this paper’s author dismisses a man in a discussion group who used the improbable example of avoiding a nuclear war by executing an innocent person. This paper excoriates a philosophy derided as a (-5[1])“temptation” elevated to (-5[1])the status of a philosophy in its takedown of (*) Henry (-5[1])Sidgwick. This essay uses the example of buying potatoes (10[1])from a grocer (10[1])to (10[1])illustrate the concept of brute facts. This essay, which argues that we should “jettison” the (10[1])“moral concept of (10[1]-5[2])‘ought,’” coined the term “consequentialism.” (10[1])For 10 points, name this G. E. M. (-5[1])Anscombe (10[2]-5[1])paper (10[3]0[4])credited with reviving virtue ethics. (10[1])■END■ (10[2]0[6])