In a book about this concept, Michael Tye argues the problem of vagueness necessitates (15[1])rejecting a certain view of it. A thinker distinguished between “phenomenal” and “access” (15[1])types of this concept. A book titled for this concept (15[1])argues that because the “finish line” that differentiates Stalinesque (15[1])and Orwellian theories doesn’t (15[1])exist, (15[3])the distinction between (15[1])the two (10[1])doesn’t either. Joseph (*) Levine used a sentence about fibers (10[1])to explain (-5[1])this concept’s explanatory gap. The “multiple (10[1])drafts” model (10[1])of (10[1])this (10[1])concept (10[3])was posited in a Daniel Dennett book (10[2])that advances a form of physicalism. Reductionist accounts of this concept were attacked (10[1])in a David Chalmers paper which coined its “hard problem.” (10[1])For 10 (-5[1])points, (10[2])name this concept, the mental awareness of experience. ■END■ (10[4]0[3])