This philosopher refuted the doctrine of “Personalism” by arguing that fire cannot (-5[1])be different from its fuel, since they do not “reach” for each other like a man and a woman. This philosopher also argued that a lamp cannot illuminate itself because there is no darkness present where a (15[1]-5[1])lamp is. (15[1])This (15[1])philosopher revived a paradoxical argument called the “tetralemma,” which can be summarized (15[2]-5[1])as (-5[1])“Not A, Not B, Not ‘A and B’, Neither A Nor B.” (15[1])Some (*) Western scholars (10[1])have interpreted this philosopher (10[1])along (10[2])Kantian (10[1])lines (10[1])for (10[1])propounding the “two truths” doctrine. (10[1])This philosopher’s argument that all (-5[2])dharmas (10[3])lacked “substance,” (10[1])or svabhava (svuh-BAH-vuh), (10[1])became (10[1])the central idea (10[1])of his (10[1])Madhyamaka (10[1])(MUH-dyuh-muh-kuh) school. For (10[1])10 points, name this Buddhist philosopher famous for his theory of sunyatta, or (0[1])“emptiness.” ■END■ (10[3])