Since R v Kapp, the Supreme Court of Canada has consistently argued that a type of equality named for this adjective is protected (10[1])by Section 15 of the Charter. That type of equality named for this adjective, which is incorporated into Jordan’s Principle, is contrasted with formal equality. John Hart Ely (“EE-lee”) claimed that a phrase starting with this adjective (-5[1])is an oxymoron, like the phrase “green pastel (10[1])redness,” a claim that has been echoed (10[1])by Antonin Scalia (“skuh-LEE-uh”) and Clarence Thomas. The use of a principle named for this multisyllabic (-5[1])adjective (-5[1])to strike down economic regulations, including in a case involving working hours for bakers, characterized the Lochner era. In the context of the interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, (10[1])this adjective is the opposite of “procedural.” For 10 points, (10[1]-5[1])unenumerated rights are protected (-5[1])by what form of due process? (10[2])■END■ (10[5]0[7])